The Politics of Fear
“May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears” – nelson mandela
Fear
is one of the most complex emotions most humans feel. From an abusive
relationship, to uncertainty at a workplace, the fear of what is known or
unknown remains to be understood as most other emotions which most often can be
diagnosed, managed or even treated.
When
we feel fear it mostly an emotional reaction to something. In cases where these
triggers are known, we feel fear because we feel powerless to control or
confront it. Reactions to fear like most other emotion is to fight to freeze or
to fight. The fear we feel as a result of social behavior are more domestic in
nature. When it expands into politics, the concept of fear hits home. That is
so because then we feel our financial wellbeing, our ability to love, our
culture, our religion etcetera threatened.
In a
political climate, fear can easily metamorphose into a commodity that is much
more complicated. Because, anger usually precedes fear the world’s most
infamous leaders have exploited it. They understand the emotion of anger is a
symptom of fear. Since the advent of the twentieth century, the world’s most
notorious politicians have used this tool mostly to divide and to rule. It
works
When
people go to the polls to cast their votes….
Let
us take this closer home and look at the US politics. From a distance, the
Trump campaign and Sanders come across as a stark contrast in terms of
ideology. A cursory look tells a different story that there is more they have in
common than what separates them.
When
Trump says Mexicans are rapist, Africans come from shithole countries, Muslims
are terrorist he exacerbates what is perceived to be the worse of these
cultural or ethnic units in a way that elevates their threat to other cultural
or ethnic units. By doing so, he draws a line around our ability to co-exist
with one another along these ethnic, religious or cultural lines. His message? They
hate us. It’s us against them and I will fight for you.
For
Sanders it is much of a different ideology but grossly the same symptom. His
brand of politics targets Billionaires, Wall street, Banks, Insurance companies’
etcetera. He says they are the reason the world is the way it is, the reason
the system is rigged against everyday working people. His surrogates propagate
the message that these institutions as an existential threat to your wellbeing.
Like Trump, he also draws a line around our ability to co-exist with these
institutions and establishments along economic lines. Their theme? They hate
us, it’s us against them and I am the man to fight for you.
So in
summary, while Trump focuses on cultural or ethnic sentiments,
Sanders on the other hand is focused on social and economic and sentiments. Both
speak to anger – a symptom of fear!
Silly
as it may sound, this brand of politics has been shown time and time again to
appeal to different spectra of people. People attribute fear to the
ever-growing populist movement across Europe. They see it as a reason the
communist party’s authoritarian rule has been successful in China and when you
put Russia in the equation, the signs become rampant of a strong state power
despite it being a democracy.
For
most Democratic leaning voters, the most important thing on the top their mind
is to defeat Trump and return to some degree of normalcy. That brings to fore
the overarching conversation around electability which Biden comfortably fills
according to current polls. But there is also an issue here and as Van Jones
puts it, Biden sees Trump as a disruptor of normalcy while Sanders sees Trump
as a result of it.
That
is telling even if both agree with most democrats that the most important job
to get done is to get Trump out! While Biden offers stability, Sanders is
perceived by many moderate as threading the dangerous line of a revolution at
the behest of his supporters and not even the political establishment can stop
the movement. Many who are not tuned in to his message argue against building a
radical movement on top of chaos. They think it will only lead to even more
chaos. That is their main paranoia, which essentially is another version of
fear. Sanders has not been able to address this. You don’t have to look beyond
his health plan to see why.
Don’t
read between the lines lest you miss the message that is not on display here.
Add
that to Trump’s fueling of fear and its easy to see why this can speak to
different ethnicities in a different way.
What seems to have eclipse that argument is…..
To
bolster that argument, Sanders seems to point to the fact that he is winning
the ideological argument and not the electoral argument. That argument gets
thrown out the window when you consider how much we know of how populists’
movements have invigorated electorates, flamed excitement in political
discourse, ultimately translating into turnouts and overall winning. One or
both haven’t been the case with Sander’s movement.
Political
ideologies engineer turn out In a world where politics has become tribal, that
argument gets thrown out of the window. Not the least his insinuation that
those who oppose his ideologies are “a part of the establishment”. By saying
so, his team have thrown the pragmatism of African American voters into abysmal
significance. You have to pause to understand that African Americans bear the
most brunt of a Republican leadership. Talk about Social security, Healthcare,
Social Justice etc. and then the fear of an economic sabotage as Sanders has
vigorously campaigned wouldn’t mean much compared to the reelection of a Donald
Trump. Yet, that is a conversation for another day.
Comments
Post a Comment